Online Document Exercises

Index :: 1913 United States Senators

The Denver Republican

January 4, 1913

 

Assembly Ready to Ratify Choice of U.S. Senators

(Thomas and Shafroth Would Confer over Jobs to Be Given in State)

The election of United States Senators Thomas and Shafroth November 5, will be taken up for confirmation by the General Assembly January 14, in accordance with the provisions of the United States constitution.

The heavy Democratic majority in both houses of the legislature makes it improbable that the newly-elected senators will have any difficulty in securing majorities on the first vote.

Should either house fail to return a majority for either, a vote in the joint session would be necessary on the second day.  If majorities were not returned then, joint sessions would continue on each successive day until the close of the session if they were not secured before.

A meeting of the newly-elected congressmen and the senators, Shafroth and Thomas, has been called to consider the patronage expected to be extended them for appointment of Coloradoans to national positions.  It was postponed because of the slight illness of Senator Thomas and the matter will be dropped until the Colorado national representatives get to Washington.

It is expected that several consular offices, foreign diplomatic and numerous federal positions will be awarded to Coloradoans and the congressmen and senators from the state intend to secure as many as possible for their friends.  Senator Thomas will seek to secure a position in the treasury department for his son-in-law, W. P. Malburn, who at present is a member of the law firm of Thomas, Bryant, Nye, and Malburn.

It was expected that the general assembly would take up the confirmation of Thomas’ election after convening, but Governor Shafroth says that the law provides that it shall not be done until the second Tuesday in January, unless an extra session is called, which he declined to call in December.

Questions

1. How were the Colorado United States senators selected? What provision of the United States Constitution provided for this?

2. How are United States senators currently selected? Why is it different than the process common in 1913? What social forces brought about the change? Was the United States Constitution changed?

3. The article discusses the various appointments of Coloradoans to federal positions. Do you think that the process described here occurs today? Why or why not?