washington/jefferson star
  abraham lincoln
government foundations government institutions political behavior public policy home  
 
       
government foundations
 
democracy and political theory
the constitution
federalism
state and local government
civil liberties
civil rights
ideologies
 
 
global resources
citizen's survival guide
in the news
thinking globally, acting locally
current events quiz
english/spanish glossary
site map
 
Source Readings: The Constitution
 

LETTERS OF BRUTUS (1788)
Robert Yates

Robert Yates was a well-educated attorney who was a member of the New York delegation to the Constitutional Convention. He opposed the new government, believing it would steal powers properly reserved for the states. Other anti-Federalists argued that the new Constitution would be used by the elite classes to collect political power and wealth in a few hands. Yates and other anti-Federalists were also alarmed by the lack of a bill of rights in the new Constitution, apparently abandoning the issues raised in the Declaration of Independence. They did not accept Federalist promises that state protections would be sufficient, that the good and ethical men in the new national government would never attack individual liberties, or that the heralded separation of powers made attacks impossible. As "Brutus," Yates voices these concerns about the new Constitution. Do you find his concerns and arguments valid? Are the Federalist responses reassuring? What groups would embrace his ideas today, and would they be correct?

 
Go to Reading