washington/jefferson star
  abraham lincoln
government foundations government institutions political behavior public policy home  
 
       
government foundations
 
democracy and political theory
the constitution
federalism
state and local government
civil liberties
civil rights
ideologies
 
 
global resources
citizen's survival guide
in the news
thinking globally, acting locally
current events quiz
english/spanish glossary
site map
 
Source Readings: Ideologies
 

THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: FRAUD, SHAM, AND HOAX (1964)
George C. Wallace

The forces of racism have always been strong in this country. When combined with political opportunism and ambition, they combine to create a heady and enticing mixture for some individuals. In the early 1960s, George C. Wallace was one of these individuals. Wallace started his political career as an economic populist, championing the common people against special interests. However, to advance politically in the Deep South of the 1960s you had to appeal to raw racial hatred, and the ambitious Wallace proved to be quite good at appealing to raw hatred. At his inauguration in 1963, he called for "Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!" and became the hero of anti–civil rights southern whites. In a demagogic style reminiscent of Joseph McCarthy, he claimed to be the defender of average Americans, and he appealed to their fears by attacking the federal government, civil rights activists, student protestors, college intellectuals, and reformers in general. The virulence of his attacks on the principles of civil rights and his outrageous claims that "welfare mothers were breeding children as a cash crop" set the stage for the spread of similar accusations by right-wing movements today. Keep in mind that Wallace used the occasion of Independence Day, 1964, to give the following speech.

As you read this speech, consider which individuals and groups Wallace is appealing to. What type of appeals does he make—strong arguments supported by indisputable facts, or emotional arguments wrapped in a false patriotism and intended to trigger a quick emotional response by the audience? Compare the text of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [Part III] with the claims Wallace makes about the bill. What false claims does he make about this measure, and why does he make them? You might find striking similarities between the arguments in this speech and the ideas advocated by the extremist groups in Part IV.

 
Go to Reading