For more articles, enter:

"United States Supreme Court" in the Subject Guide, and then go to subdivision "analysis."

"United States Supreme Court" in the Subject Guide, and then go to subdivision "evaluation."

"United States Supreme Court" in the Subject Guide, and then go to subdivision "history."

"United States Supreme Court" in the Subject Guide, and then go to subdivision "philosophy."

"federal courts" in the Subject Guide.

Mathematicians judge the Supreme Court. (Ideal Justice). (analysis of voting patterns) E. Klarreich. Science News June 28, 2003 v163 i26 p405(1) (518 words)

Secularism at bay. (Opinion). C. John Sommerville. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life June-July 2003 p11(3) (1853 words)

Explaining Supreme Court policymaking in civil rights: the influence of the solicitor general, 1953-2002. Barbara L. Graham. Policy Studies Journal May 2003 v31 i2 p253(19) (8678 words)

1953: the Warren Court. (Time Machine August/September). Frederic D. Schwarz. American Heritage August-Sept 2003 v54 i4 p72(1) (661 words)

The case that made the court. Michael J. Glennon. The Wilson Quarterly Summer 2003 v27 i3 p20(9) (5096 words)

High Noon for 'Diversity'. George F. Will. Newsweek May 26, 2003 p76

Judicial Review and the Supreme Court - Judicial review is an essential function extended to the Supreme Court under our system of government. (Critical Essay) Walter Berns. World and I Feb 2003 v18 i2 pNA

A fickle federalism: the Rehnquist Court hobbles Congress--and the states, too. Richard Briffault. The American Prospect March 2003 v14 i3 pA26(3)

Reading between the lines: analyzing the Supreme Court's views on gender discrimination in employment, 1971-1982. Vicki Lens. Social Service Review March 2003 v77 i1 p25(27)

Getting personal. (US Supreme Court Justices) Tony Mauro. American Lawyer May 2003 v25 i5 p33(1)

Judging pay: Chief Justice William Rehnquist has for years argued that low salaries threaten the quality of the nation's judiciary. He just hasn't made the case. Steven Lubet. American Lawyer March 2003 v25 i3 p114(2)

The right-wing assault: what's at stake, what's already happened and what could yet occur. (Court Packing). Cass R. Sunstein. The American Prospect March 2003 v14 i3 pA2(3)

Tribute to Justice Byron R. White. William H. Rehnquist. Stanford Law Review Oct 2002 v55 i1 p1(1)

Justice Byron R. White: the legend and the man. David M. Ebel. Stanford Law Review Oct 2002 v55 i1 p5(7)

The origination and early development of free speech in the United States a brief overview: after the tumultuous early years in our nation's history, the status of freedom of speech remained fairly quiescent in American jurisprudence for over 100 years. Michael Kahn. Florida Bar Journal Oct 2002 v76 i9 p71(6)

Executive-judicial interaction as a factor in explaining presidential policy making. (Statistical Data Included) Barbara L. Graham. Presidential Studies Quarterly Sept 2002 v32 i3 p509(22)

The Court's Terrible Two. (recent Supreme Court decisions: school vouchers and drug testing)(Brief Article) Herman Schwartz. The Nation July 22, 2002 v275 i4 p4

A rule unfit for all seasons: monitoring attorney-client communications violates privilege and the Sixth Amendment. Avidan Y. Cover. Cornell Law Review July 2002 v87 i5 p1233(26)

Holding Courts In Contempt: To stop Bush from robbing them of power, especially in the war on terror, judges need to win public support. The Pledge wasn't a good start. (federal court's decision about Pledge of Allegiance)(Brief Article) Stuart Taylor Jr.. Newsweek July 8, 2002 p38

A reply to Riley. (Supreme Court and presidential and congressional constitutional authority) Morton A. Kaplan. World and I Feb 2002 v17 i2 p300

Supreme Court voting patterns 1994-2001. (Cases, Controversy, and the Court). (Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included) Aaron Epstein. Social Education Jan-Feb 2002 v66 i1 p40(2)

Federalism Outcomes and Ideological Preferences: The U.S. Supreme Court and Preemption Cases. Brady Baybeck, William Lowry. Publius Summer 2000 v30 i3 p73

Abortion and Autonomy. WENDY KAMINER. The American Prospect June 5, 2000 v11 i14 p40

Minor Infraction - The Supreme Court misunderstands porn. Jeffrey Rosen. The New Republic June 3, 2002 p17

The anti-antidiscrimination agenda. (of the U.S. Supreme Court) Jed Rubenfeld. Yale Law Journal March 2002 v111 i5 p1141(38)

U.S. Supreme Court Trends. CHARLES F. WILLIAMS. Social Education Oct 2000 v64 i6 p380

Medium rare scrutiny. (satire) Michael Stokes Paulsen. Constitutional Commentary Winter 1998 p397(1)

The court rediscovers federalism. (U.S. Supreme Court)(We Hold These Truths) Douglas W. Kmiec. Policy Review Sept-Oct 1997 n85 p60(3)

Popular influence on Supreme Court decisions. (comment on an article by William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan in the American Political Science Review, vol. 87, p. 87-101)(includes response by Mishler and Sheehan) Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A. Segal, William Mishler, Reginald Sheehan. American Political Science Review Sept 1994 v88 n3 p711(14)

The Court's Three Mashalls(*). Frank J. Colucci. Polity Fall 2000 v33 i1 p127

"For Their Own Good" - The Cherokees, the Supreme Court, and the early history of American conscience. Stephen G. Breyer. The New Republic August 7, 2000 p32 Mag.Coll.: 103M0221.

The Supreme Court and the Undoing of the Second Reconstruction. J. Morgan Kousser. National Forum Spring 2000 v80 i2 p25

Justice on a grand scale: William J. Brennan, 1906-1997. (Obituary) Stephen J. Wermeil. Newsweek August 4, 1997 v130 n5 p72(1) Bus.Coll.: 103N1967.

Jaffa v. Bork: an exchange. (philosophical debate between Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Harry V. Jaffa and former Judge Robert Bork over issues of constitutional law and Bork's review of 'Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution' by Jaffa) National Review March 21, 1994 v46 n5 p 56(4) Mag.Coll.: 72L0841.

Death, Juries and Scalia. (Brief Article) ALEXANDER COCKBURN. The Nation July 15, 2002 v275 i3 p7

A courtly gentleman. (retired Supreme Court Justice Byron White) (Brief Article) (Obituary) Lewis J. Lord. U.S. News & World Report April 29, 2002 p8

The use that the future makes of the past: John Marshall's greatness and its lessons for today's Supreme Court Justices. Jack M. Balkin. William and Mary Law Review March 2002 v43 i4 p1321(18)

The education of Clarence Thomas. Tony Mauro. American Lawyer August 2001 v23 i8 p76

For Some, Choice Gets Harder. (the Supreme Court and reproductive freedom)(Brief Article) Susan R. Estrich. The Nation Oct 9, 2000 v271 i10 p19

Color and the Court. (Supreme Court and racial justice) CHRISTOPHER EDLEY JR.. The Nation Oct 9, 2000 v271 i10 p20 Mag.Coll.: 104G0193.

Thurgood Marshall: The Brain Of The Civil Rights Movement. (TIME 100)(Brief Article) Adam Cohen. Time June 14, 1999 v153 i23 p172

The reconstitution of American federalism? The Rehnquist Court and federal-state relations, 1991-1997. (The State of American Federalism, 1997-1998) Richard A. Brisbin Jr.. Publius Wntr 1998 v28 i1 p189(2)

Democracy and distrust after twenty years: Ely's process theory and constitutional law from 1990 to 2000. (John Hart Ely) Brian Boynton. Stanford Law Review Nov 2000 v53 i2 p397

A Political Regimes Approach to the Analysis of Legal Decisions. Cornell Clayton, David A. May. Polity Winter 1999 v32 i2 p233

Toward a new jurisprudence of constitutional federalism: the Supreme Court in the 1990s and public administration. David H. Rosenbloom, Bernard H. Ross. American Review of Public Administration June 1998 v28 n2 p107(19) Bus.Coll.: 108Z0130.

The decade of Supreme Court avoidance of AIDS: denial of certiorari in HIV-AIDS cases and its adverse effects on human rights. (Symposium on Health Care Policy: What Lessons Have We Learned from the AIDS Pandemic?) Michael L. Closen. Albany Law Review Spring 1998 v61 n3 p897-987

The most dangerous branch? The Supreme Court has been signaling that it will treat Congress roughly in the coming decade--but nobody seems to be paying attention. (The Law). (Industry Overview) Simon Lazarus. The Atlantic Monthly June 2002 v289 i6 p24(4)

High drama at the Supreme Court: prior restraint is rejected in a case of Pentagon documents that detailed the history of the Vietnam war. ('71). (Brief Article) John Giuffo. Columbia Journalism Review Nov-Dec 2001 v40 i4 p70(2)

The judiciary: the origins of judicial review. (A Centennial Retrospective) Warren Burger. National Forum Fall 1996 v76 n4 p37(2)

Statutory construction and congressional response. Joseph Ignagni, James Meernik, Kimi Lynn King. American Politics Quarterly Oct 1998 v26 n4 p459(26)

Made to be broken: the high court is increasingly opposed to foolish consistencies. (U.S. Supreme Court's adherence to procedural rules) Tony Mauro. American Lawyer March 2002 v24 i3 p69(2)

Modest Proposal - Stephen Breyer restrains himself. Jeffrey Rosen. The New Republic Jan 14, 2002 p21

"The cult of the robe": the U.S. Supreme Court in the American mind. (Cases, Controversy, and the Court). Barbara A. Perry. Social Education Jan-Feb 2002 v66 i1 p30(4)

The Rehnquist court. (Cases, Controversy, and the Court). Erwin Chemerinsky. Social Education Jan-Feb 2002 v66 i1 p34(5)

Supreme Court voting patterns 1994-2001. (Cases, Controversy, and the Court). (Brief Article)(Statistical Data Included) Aaron Epstein. Social Education Jan-Feb 2002 v66 i1 p40(2)

Supreme Court coverage: a lawyer arguing a case before the U.S. Supreme Court has only thirty minutes to focus attention on the nine justices on the bench. (Cases, Controversy, and the Court). Charles Bierbauer. Social Education Jan-Feb 2002 v66 i1 p63(3)

Supreme Hubris: How the Court overrules the Constitution. Ramesh Ponnuru. National Review, July 31, 2000 pNA

The Supreme Question: Abortion, gays, prayer, parochial schools, criminal rights--in one close call after another, the high court's dramatic rulings altered the landscape. Inside a divided court, and how the next president will shape it. (National Affairs)(Brief Article) Newsweek July 10, 2000 p18

More Supreme than Ever. (Supreme Court decisions involving the Eleventh Amendment) Hadley Arkes. National Review, July 26, 1999 v50 i14 p38

Keeping the Faith: A Cultural History of the United States Supreme Court. (Review) Craig Hemmens. Perspectives on Political Science, Winter 1999 v28 i1 p33(1)

The United States Supreme Court: A Political and Legal Analysis. (Review) Philip Kronebush. Perspectives on Political Science, Winter 1999 v28 i1 p34(1)

Judicial hyperactivity: the Federal Circuit's discomfort with its appellate role. William C. Rooklidge, Matthew F. Weil. Berkeley Technology Law Journal Spring 2000 v15 i2 p725

Diabolical federalism: a functional critique and proposed reconstruction of death penalty federal habeas. Andrew Hammel. American Criminal Law Review Wntr 2002 v39 i1 p1(99)

The remand that made the Court expand. (The Sound of Legal Thunder: The Chaotic Consequences of Crushing Constitutional Butterflies) Maxwell L. Stearns. Constitutional Commentary Winter 1999 v16 i3 p581-586

Setting incorporationism straight: a reinterpretation of the Slaughter-House Cases. Kevin Christopher Newsom. Yale Law Journal, January 2000 v109 i4 p643

Triangulating the Constitution. (how liberals and conservatives use the US Supreme Court to achieve their political objectives) Gary Rosen. Commentary, July 1999 v108 i1 p59