| District of Columbia |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
269,366 |
47.1% |
302,693 |
52.9% |
| 0-4 |
16,483 |
2.9% |
16,053 |
2.8% |
| 5-9 |
17,760 |
3.1% |
17,625 |
3.1% |
| 10-14 |
15,097 |
2.6% |
14,921 |
2.6% |
| 15-19 |
18,016 |
3.1% |
19,851 |
3.5% |
| 20-24 |
23,617 |
4.1% |
28,206 |
4.9% |
| 25-29 |
25,232 |
4.4% |
27,617 |
4.8% |
| 30-34 |
24,522 |
4.3% |
24,391 |
4.3% |
| 35-39 |
23,391 |
4.1% |
22,558 |
3.9% |
| 40-44 |
20,618 |
3.6% |
21,110 |
3.7% |
| 45-49 |
18,745 |
3.3% |
20,652 |
3.6% |
| 50-54 |
16,615 |
2.9% |
19,298 |
3.4% |
| 55-59 |
12,675 |
2.2% |
15,128 |
2.6% |
| 60-64 |
10,052 |
1.8% |
11,928 |
2.1% |
| 65-69 |
8,162 |
1.4% |
10,363 |
1.8% |
| 70-74 |
6,941 |
1.2% |
10,453 |
1.8% |
| 75-79 |
5,602 |
1.0% |
9,374 |
1.6% |
| 80-84 |
3,415 |
0.6% |
6,613 |
1.2% |
| 85 |
2,423 |
0.4% |
6,552 |
1.1% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
282,970 |
46.6% |
323,930 |
53.4% |
| 0-4 |
18,930 |
3.1% |
18,421 |
3.0% |
| 5-9 |
16,299 |
2.7% |
15,698 |
2.6% |
| 10-14 |
14,752 |
2.4% |
14,566 |
2.4% |
| 15-19 |
20,084 |
3.3% |
21,193 |
3.5% |
| 20-24 |
27,842 |
4.6% |
31,865 |
5.3% |
| 25-29 |
30,224 |
5.0% |
32,905 |
5.4% |
| 30-34 |
28,320 |
4.7% |
29,827 |
4.9% |
| 35-39 |
25,123 |
4.1% |
26,276 |
4.3% |
| 40-44 |
20,760 |
3.4% |
23,037 |
3.8% |
| 45-49 |
15,931 |
2.6% |
17,941 |
3.0% |
| 50-54 |
13,344 |
2.2% |
14,815 |
2.4% |
| 55-59 |
11,647 |
1.9% |
13,794 |
2.3% |
| 60-64 |
11,169 |
1.8% |
14,290 |
2.4% |
| 65-69 |
10,314 |
1.7% |
14,527 |
2.4% |
| 70-74 |
7,661 |
1.3% |
12,051 |
2.0% |
| 75-79 |
5,559 |
0.9% |
10,103 |
1.7% |
| 80-84 |
3,034 |
0.5% |
6,751 |
1.1% |
| 85 |
1,977 |
0.3% |
5,870 |
1.0% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|