| Orange County |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota
, suggests negative population growth that might be due to any number
of factors, including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased
emigration from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like this, suggests
high birthrates, falling or stable death rates, and the potential for
rapid population growth. Most areas, however, fall somewhere between these
two extremes and have a population pyramid that resembles a square, indicating
slow and sustained growth with the birth rate exceeding the death rate,
though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male |
|
Female |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
443,716 |
49.5% |
452,628 |
50.5% |
| 0-4 |
31,444 |
3.5% |
29,931 |
3.3% |
| 5-9 |
33,477 |
3.7% |
31,764 |
3.5% |
| 10-14 |
32,690 |
3.6% |
30,982 |
3.5% |
| 15-19 |
32,108 |
3.6% |
31,234 |
3.5% |
| 20-24 |
35,810 |
4.0% |
34,953 |
3.9% |
| 25-29 |
37,543 |
4.2% |
36,375 |
4.1% |
| 30-34 |
38,798 |
4.3% |
36,339 |
4.1% |
| 35-39 |
40,870 |
4.6% |
39,405 |
4.4% |
| 40-44 |
36,869 |
4.1% |
36,477 |
4.1% |
| 45-49 |
30,169 |
3.4% |
31,048 |
3.5% |
| 50-54 |
25,010 |
2.8% |
26,286 |
2.9% |
| 55-59 |
17,982 |
2.0% |
19,431 |
2.2% |
| 60-64 |
13,757 |
1.5% |
15,633 |
1.7% |
| 65-69 |
12,022 |
1.3% |
14,042 |
1.6% |
| 70-74 |
10,063 |
1.1% |
13,242 |
1.5% |
| 75-79 |
7,616 |
0.8% |
11,194 |
1.2% |
| 80-84 |
4,663 |
0.5% |
7,474 |
0.8% |
| 85 |
2,825 |
0.3% |
6,818 |
0.8% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male |
|
Female |
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
336,061 |
49.6% |
341,430 |
50.4% |
| 0-4 |
25,477 |
3.8% |
24,385 |
3.6% |
| 5-9 |
23,207 |
3.4% |
22,574 |
3.3% |
| 10-14 |
21,089 |
3.1% |
20,360 |
3.0% |
| 15-19 |
26,158 |
3.9% |
22,874 |
3.4% |
| 20-24 |
31,655 |
4.7% |
29,605 |
4.4% |
| 25-29 |
36,910 |
5.4% |
34,589 |
5.1% |
| 30-34 |
34,586 |
5.1% |
32,756 |
4.8% |
| 35-39 |
27,936 |
4.1% |
27,068 |
4.0% |
| 40-44 |
22,944 |
3.4% |
23,198 |
3.4% |
| 45-49 |
17,269 |
2.5% |
17,723 |
2.6% |
| 50-54 |
13,908 |
2.1% |
15,056 |
2.2% |
| 55-59 |
13,112 |
1.9% |
14,116 |
2.1% |
| 60-64 |
12,376 |
1.8% |
14,526 |
2.1% |
| 65-69 |
11,299 |
1.7% |
13,949 |
2.1% |
| 70-74 |
8,292 |
1.2% |
10,545 |
1.6% |
| 75-79 |
5,261 |
0.8% |
7,863 |
1.2% |
| 80-84 |
2,832 |
0.4% |
5,461 |
0.8% |
| 85 |
1,750 |
0.3% |
4,782 |
0.7% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|