| Nevada |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
1,018,051 |
50.9% |
980,206 |
49.1% |
| 0-4 |
74,800 |
3.7% |
71,017 |
3.6% |
| 5-9 |
76,547 |
3.8% |
72,775 |
3.6% |
| 10-14 |
71,623 |
3.6% |
67,570 |
3.4% |
| 15-19 |
65,868 |
3.3% |
61,301 |
3.1% |
| 20-24 |
68,013 |
3.4% |
61,993 |
3.1% |
| 25-29 |
77,234 |
3.9% |
71,492 |
3.6% |
| 30-34 |
83,053 |
4.2% |
74,832 |
3.7% |
| 35-39 |
87,034 |
4.4% |
78,876 |
3.9% |
| 40-44 |
80,672 |
4.0% |
75,379 |
3.8% |
| 45-49 |
71,140 |
3.6% |
69,074 |
3.5% |
| 50-54 |
64,516 |
3.2% |
64,320 |
3.2% |
| 55-59 |
52,500 |
2.6% |
52,557 |
2.6% |
| 60-64 |
43,083 |
2.2% |
42,059 |
2.1% |
| 65-69 |
35,889 |
1.8% |
35,498 |
1.8% |
| 70-74 |
29,276 |
1.5% |
31,112 |
1.6% |
| 75-79 |
20,579 |
1.0% |
24,272 |
1.2% |
| 80-84 |
10,580 |
0.5% |
14,734 |
0.7% |
| 85 |
5,644 |
0.3% |
11,345 |
0.6% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
611,880 |
50.9% |
589,953 |
49.1% |
| 0-4 |
47,368 |
3.9% |
44,849 |
3.7% |
| 5-9 |
43,840 |
3.6% |
41,722 |
3.5% |
| 10-14 |
38,820 |
3.2% |
37,188 |
3.1% |
| 15-19 |
38,254 |
3.2% |
35,906 |
3.0% |
| 20-24 |
45,306 |
3.8% |
42,640 |
3.5% |
| 25-29 |
58,212 |
4.8% |
52,371 |
4.4% |
| 30-34 |
57,680 |
4.8% |
53,764 |
4.5% |
| 35-39 |
52,367 |
4.4% |
48,901 |
4.1% |
| 40-44 |
46,670 |
3.9% |
44,327 |
3.7% |
| 45-49 |
38,188 |
3.2% |
36,040 |
3.0% |
| 50-54 |
31,841 |
2.6% |
29,931 |
2.5% |
| 55-59 |
28,017 |
2.3% |
26,664 |
2.2% |
| 60-64 |
26,746 |
2.2% |
26,590 |
2.2% |
| 65-69 |
24,702 |
2.1% |
25,410 |
2.1% |
| 70-74 |
17,042 |
1.4% |
18,631 |
1.6% |
| 75-79 |
9,985 |
0.8% |
12,579 |
1.0% |
| 80-84 |
4,557 |
0.4% |
7,262 |
0.6% |
| 85 |
2,285 |
0.2% |
5,178 |
0.4% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|