| North Dakota |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
320,524 |
49.9% |
321,676 |
50.1% |
| 0-4 |
20,185 |
3.1% |
19,215 |
3.0% |
| 5-9 |
21,997 |
3.4% |
20,985 |
3.3% |
| 10-14 |
24,499 |
3.8% |
22,965 |
3.6% |
| 15-19 |
27,760 |
4.3% |
25,858 |
4.0% |
| 20-24 |
26,831 |
4.2% |
23,672 |
3.7% |
| 25-29 |
20,268 |
3.2% |
18,524 |
2.9% |
| 30-34 |
19,534 |
3.0% |
18,561 |
2.9% |
| 35-39 |
23,668 |
3.7% |
23,323 |
3.6% |
| 40-44 |
25,577 |
4.0% |
25,436 |
4.0% |
| 45-49 |
24,351 |
3.8% |
23,085 |
3.6% |
| 50-54 |
19,523 |
3.0% |
18,472 |
2.9% |
| 55-59 |
14,599 |
2.3% |
14,327 |
2.2% |
| 60-64 |
11,851 |
1.8% |
12,656 |
2.0% |
| 65-69 |
10,861 |
1.7% |
12,281 |
1.9% |
| 70-74 |
10,473 |
1.6% |
12,286 |
1.9% |
| 75-79 |
8,265 |
1.3% |
10,820 |
1.7% |
| 80-84 |
5,715 |
0.9% |
9,051 |
1.4% |
| 85 |
4,567 |
0.7% |
10,159 |
1.6% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
318,201 |
49.8% |
320,599 |
50.2% |
| 0-4 |
24,413 |
3.8% |
23,432 |
3.7% |
| 5-9 |
26,724 |
4.2% |
25,308 |
4.0% |
| 10-14 |
25,165 |
3.9% |
23,655 |
3.7% |
| 15-19 |
24,368 |
3.8% |
22,300 |
3.5% |
| 20-24 |
25,187 |
3.9% |
22,686 |
3.6% |
| 25-29 |
25,613 |
4.0% |
24,541 |
3.8% |
| 30-34 |
27,065 |
4.2% |
26,796 |
4.2% |
| 35-39 |
25,869 |
4.0% |
24,264 |
3.8% |
| 40-44 |
20,619 |
3.2% |
19,268 |
3.0% |
| 45-49 |
15,520 |
2.4% |
15,115 |
2.4% |
| 50-54 |
12,960 |
2.0% |
13,489 |
2.1% |
| 55-59 |
12,704 |
2.0% |
13,564 |
2.1% |
| 60-64 |
13,225 |
2.1% |
13,895 |
2.2% |
| 65-69 |
11,917 |
1.9% |
13,033 |
2.0% |
| 70-74 |
10,216 |
1.6% |
12,375 |
1.9% |
| 75-79 |
7,976 |
1.2% |
11,014 |
1.7% |
| 80-84 |
5,055 |
0.8% |
8,229 |
1.3% |
| 85 |
3,605 |
0.6% |
7,635 |
1.2% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|