| Rhode Island |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
503,635 |
48.0% |
544,684 |
52.0% |
| 0-4 |
32,602 |
3.1% |
31,294 |
3.0% |
| 5-9 |
36,910 |
3.5% |
34,995 |
3.3% |
| 10-14 |
36,766 |
3.5% |
34,604 |
3.3% |
| 15-19 |
38,199 |
3.6% |
37,246 |
3.6% |
| 20-24 |
35,595 |
3.4% |
36,218 |
3.5% |
| 25-29 |
31,792 |
3.0% |
32,940 |
3.1% |
| 30-34 |
36,821 |
3.5% |
38,773 |
3.7% |
| 35-39 |
41,812 |
4.0% |
43,552 |
4.2% |
| 40-44 |
41,452 |
4.0% |
43,494 |
4.1% |
| 45-49 |
36,702 |
3.5% |
38,727 |
3.7% |
| 50-54 |
32,660 |
3.1% |
33,774 |
3.2% |
| 55-59 |
24,024 |
2.3% |
25,958 |
2.5% |
| 60-64 |
18,298 |
1.7% |
20,709 |
2.0% |
| 65-69 |
16,408 |
1.6% |
19,615 |
1.9% |
| 70-74 |
16,143 |
1.5% |
21,518 |
2.1% |
| 75-79 |
13,637 |
1.3% |
20,439 |
1.9% |
| 80-84 |
8,392 |
0.8% |
15,353 |
1.5% |
| 85 |
5,422 |
0.5% |
15,475 |
1.5% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
481,496 |
48.0% |
521,968 |
52.0% |
| 0-4 |
34,384 |
3.4% |
32,585 |
3.2% |
| 5-9 |
32,916 |
3.3% |
30,815 |
3.1% |
| 10-14 |
30,261 |
3.0% |
29,145 |
2.9% |
| 15-19 |
35,764 |
3.6% |
35,098 |
3.5% |
| 20-24 |
42,946 |
4.3% |
42,134 |
4.2% |
| 25-29 |
42,980 |
4.3% |
42,872 |
4.3% |
| 30-34 |
43,387 |
4.3% |
44,385 |
4.4% |
| 35-39 |
38,891 |
3.9% |
39,685 |
4.0% |
| 40-44 |
34,329 |
3.4% |
34,712 |
3.5% |
| 45-49 |
25,984 |
2.6% |
27,399 |
2.7% |
| 50-54 |
20,597 |
2.1% |
22,445 |
2.2% |
| 55-59 |
19,842 |
2.0% |
22,235 |
2.2% |
| 60-64 |
21,571 |
2.1% |
25,555 |
2.5% |
| 65-69 |
20,821 |
2.1% |
26,389 |
2.6% |
| 70-74 |
15,773 |
1.6% |
22,633 |
2.3% |
| 75-79 |
10,964 |
1.1% |
18,705 |
1.9% |
| 80-84 |
6,036 |
0.6% |
13,210 |
1.3% |
| 85 |
4,050 |
0.4% |
11,966 |
1.2% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|