| Texas |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
10,352,910 |
49.6% |
10,498,910 |
50.4% |
| 0-4 |
830,745 |
4.0% |
793,883 |
3.8% |
| 5-9 |
844,959 |
4.1% |
809,225 |
3.9% |
| 10-14 |
834,526 |
4.0% |
796,666 |
3.8% |
| 15-19 |
847,462 |
4.1% |
788,770 |
3.8% |
| 20-24 |
794,799 |
3.8% |
744,605 |
3.6% |
| 25-29 |
810,965 |
3.9% |
780,557 |
3.7% |
| 30-34 |
798,051 |
3.8% |
772,510 |
3.7% |
| 35-39 |
849,270 |
4.1% |
839,613 |
4.0% |
| 40-44 |
819,334 |
3.9% |
814,021 |
3.9% |
| 45-49 |
702,056 |
3.4% |
714,122 |
3.4% |
| 50-54 |
587,762 |
2.8% |
607,197 |
2.9% |
| 55-59 |
436,105 |
2.1% |
460,416 |
2.2% |
| 60-64 |
334,695 |
1.6% |
366,974 |
1.8% |
| 65-69 |
283,517 |
1.4% |
326,915 |
1.6% |
| 70-74 |
234,965 |
1.1% |
297,211 |
1.4% |
| 75-79 |
175,337 |
0.8% |
248,697 |
1.2% |
| 80-84 |
100,142 |
0.5% |
167,808 |
0.8% |
| 85 |
68,220 |
0.3% |
169,720 |
0.8% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
8,365,963 |
49.3% |
8,620,547 |
50.7% |
| 0-4 |
711,144 |
4.2% |
678,910 |
4.0% |
| 5-9 |
713,663 |
4.2% |
682,510 |
4.0% |
| 10-14 |
662,092 |
3.9% |
632,261 |
3.7% |
| 15-19 |
672,557 |
4.0% |
639,134 |
3.8% |
| 20-24 |
679,254 |
4.0% |
655,158 |
3.9% |
| 25-29 |
774,830 |
4.6% |
757,910 |
4.5% |
| 30-34 |
781,544 |
4.6% |
771,887 |
4.5% |
| 35-39 |
685,982 |
4.0% |
686,539 |
4.0% |
| 40-44 |
578,047 |
3.4% |
588,457 |
3.5% |
| 45-49 |
448,232 |
2.6% |
458,350 |
2.7% |
| 50-54 |
352,082 |
2.1% |
369,970 |
2.2% |
| 55-59 |
318,069 |
1.9% |
343,521 |
2.0% |
| 60-64 |
292,996 |
1.7% |
334,835 |
2.0% |
| 65-69 |
258,436 |
1.5% |
312,833 |
1.8% |
| 70-74 |
184,088 |
1.1% |
242,882 |
1.4% |
| 75-79 |
130,581 |
0.8% |
203,433 |
1.2% |
| 80-84 |
75,819 |
0.4% |
141,899 |
0.8% |
| 85 |
46,547 |
0.3% |
120,058 |
0.7% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|