| Utah |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
1,119,031 |
50.1% |
1,114,138 |
49.9% |
| 0-4 |
107,663 |
4.8% |
101,715 |
4.6% |
| 5-9 |
99,603 |
4.5% |
93,430 |
4.2% |
| 10-14 |
98,541 |
4.4% |
93,747 |
4.2% |
| 15-19 |
107,921 |
4.8% |
108,357 |
4.9% |
| 20-24 |
112,446 |
5.0% |
112,706 |
5.0% |
| 25-29 |
92,732 |
4.2% |
85,742 |
3.8% |
| 30-34 |
76,853 |
3.4% |
71,737 |
3.2% |
| 35-39 |
76,507 |
3.4% |
74,188 |
3.3% |
| 40-44 |
75,069 |
3.4% |
73,772 |
3.3% |
| 45-49 |
66,052 |
3.0% |
65,613 |
2.9% |
| 50-54 |
52,896 |
2.4% |
53,149 |
2.4% |
| 55-59 |
39,374 |
1.8% |
40,679 |
1.8% |
| 60-64 |
30,146 |
1.3% |
32,309 |
1.4% |
| 65-69 |
25,565 |
1.1% |
28,169 |
1.3% |
| 70-74 |
22,151 |
1.0% |
25,663 |
1.1% |
| 75-79 |
17,357 |
0.8% |
22,388 |
1.0% |
| 80-84 |
10,978 |
0.5% |
16,200 |
0.7% |
| 85 |
7,177 |
0.3% |
14,574 |
0.7% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
855,759 |
49.7% |
867,091 |
50.3% |
| 0-4 |
86,889 |
5.0% |
82,744 |
4.8% |
| 5-9 |
94,404 |
5.5% |
89,270 |
5.2% |
| 10-14 |
94,416 |
5.5% |
89,430 |
5.2% |
| 15-19 |
76,321 |
4.4% |
76,134 |
4.4% |
| 20-24 |
68,439 |
4.0% |
69,383 |
4.0% |
| 25-29 |
69,370 |
4.0% |
67,951 |
3.9% |
| 30-34 |
68,771 |
4.0% |
68,806 |
4.0% |
| 35-39 |
62,370 |
3.6% |
61,839 |
3.6% |
| 40-44 |
50,245 |
2.9% |
50,218 |
2.9% |
| 45-49 |
38,179 |
2.2% |
38,969 |
2.3% |
| 50-54 |
30,160 |
1.8% |
31,173 |
1.8% |
| 55-59 |
26,676 |
1.5% |
28,254 |
1.6% |
| 60-64 |
25,229 |
1.5% |
27,252 |
1.6% |
| 65-69 |
22,719 |
1.3% |
25,957 |
1.5% |
| 70-74 |
17,770 |
1.0% |
21,741 |
1.3% |
| 75-79 |
12,218 |
0.7% |
17,048 |
1.0% |
| 80-84 |
7,135 |
0.4% |
11,759 |
0.7% |
| 85 |
4,448 |
0.3% |
9,163 |
0.5% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|