| Arkansas |
 |
AGE DISTRIBUTION
Drawn as a "population pyramid," an area's age-sex structure
hints at its patterns of growth. A top heavy pyramid, like the one for
Grant County, North Dakota , suggests
negative population growth that might be due to any number of factors,
including high death rates, low birth rates, and increased emigration
from the area. A bottom heavy pyramid, like the one drawn for Orange
County, Florida , suggests high birthrates, falling or stable death
rates, and the potential for rapid population growth. Most areas, however,
fall somewhere between these two extremes and have a population pyramid
that resembles a square, indicating slow and sustained growth with the
birth rate exceeding the death rate, though not by a great margin.
| Age Distribution by Sex, 2000
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
1,304,693 |
48.8% |
1,368,707 |
51.2% |
| 0-4 |
92,649 |
3.5% |
88,936 |
3.3% |
| 5-9 |
95,940 |
3.6% |
91,284 |
3.4% |
| 10-14 |
99,300 |
3.7% |
93,635 |
3.5% |
| 15-19 |
102,105 |
3.8% |
96,660 |
3.6% |
| 20-24 |
91,763 |
3.4% |
89,835 |
3.4% |
| 25-29 |
89,038 |
3.3% |
87,636 |
3.3% |
| 30-34 |
88,236 |
3.3% |
87,935 |
3.3% |
| 35-39 |
99,280 |
3.7% |
101,060 |
3.8% |
| 40-44 |
97,840 |
3.7% |
99,947 |
3.7% |
| 45-49 |
89,091 |
3.3% |
92,822 |
3.5% |
| 50-54 |
82,153 |
3.1% |
85,453 |
3.2% |
| 55-59 |
66,989 |
2.5% |
72,404 |
2.7% |
| 60-64 |
55,881 |
2.1% |
61,509 |
2.3% |
| 65-69 |
48,740 |
1.8% |
56,435 |
2.1% |
| 70-74 |
41,164 |
1.5% |
51,995 |
1.9% |
| 75-79 |
31,465 |
1.2% |
45,052 |
1.7% |
| 80-84 |
19,498 |
0.7% |
33,178 |
1.2% |
| 85 |
13,561 |
0.5% |
32,931 |
1.2% |
| Age Distribution by Sex, 1990
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
| Total Population |
1,133,076 |
48.2% |
1,217,649 |
51.8% |
| 0-4 |
84,299 |
3.6% |
80,368 |
3.4% |
| 5-9 |
89,592 |
3.8% |
85,459 |
3.6% |
| 10-14 |
90,639 |
3.9% |
85,458 |
3.6% |
| 15-19 |
92,092 |
3.9% |
87,530 |
3.7% |
| 20-24 |
80,831 |
3.4% |
81,919 |
3.5% |
| 25-29 |
88,116 |
3.7% |
90,920 |
3.9% |
| 30-34 |
87,784 |
3.7% |
92,225 |
3.9% |
| 35-39 |
82,637 |
3.5% |
87,012 |
3.7% |
| 40-44 |
76,891 |
3.3% |
80,163 |
3.4% |
| 45-49 |
64,336 |
2.7% |
67,749 |
2.9% |
| 50-54 |
53,671 |
2.3% |
57,581 |
2.4% |
| 55-59 |
49,746 |
2.1% |
56,065 |
2.4% |
| 60-64 |
49,572 |
2.1% |
58,012 |
2.5% |
| 65-69 |
47,930 |
2.0% |
58,720 |
2.5% |
| 70-74 |
38,618 |
1.6% |
50,693 |
2.2% |
| 75-79 |
28,792 |
1.2% |
42,768 |
1.8% |
| 80-84 |
16,993 |
0.7% |
30,328 |
1.3% |
| 85 |
10,537 |
0.4% |
24,679 |
1.0% |
Source: Census 2000 analyzed by the Social
Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN).

|